|
|
| split kick | ||||||
 |
||||||
| Previous Image | Next Image | ||||||
|
Description: Alex on a sunny day
Picture Stats: Views: 2643 Filesize: 39.46kB Height: 453 Width: 604 Posted by: Nurrish at August 31, 2009, 09:27:18 PM Image Linking Codes
|
||||||
| 0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this picture. |
| Bbmthbloke Posts:2363 | August 31, 2009, 11:02:36 PM so its higher than 'reccomended' or 'advicable' Tho this 'reccomended' doesnt seem to b v widely advertised |
| Nurrish Posts:26 | August 31, 2009, 10:59:49 PM welll when u brake ur nose doing a back to front pads become point less |
| Nurrish Posts:26 | August 31, 2009, 10:58:52 PM thank u tim atleast one is talking about the picture lol |
| dark-castles2 Posts:1545 
| August 31, 2009, 10:58:27 PM Cant you just have them were they sre comfortable for you, and i see no pads! shameful! |
| sprog Posts:1622 
| August 31, 2009, 10:58:21 PM Because they go around your calf muscle  |
| chocl8 Posts:1504 | August 31, 2009, 10:56:58 PM :O it IS like mine!  |
| Bbmthbloke Posts:2363 | August 31, 2009, 10:56:32 PM erm 'most of us have them higher than normal'? erm should 'normal' b where 'most' have them? or 'normal' IS where 'most' have them? Or shall we go to mean mode median route? |
| Nurrish Posts:26 | August 31, 2009, 10:47:12 PM ok i short ok |
| dark-castles2 Posts:1545
| August 31, 2009, 10:46:02 PM Why they called calf cuff's then? if they go on your shin |
| Nurrish Posts:26 | August 31, 2009, 10:30:29 PM yer wot sprog said |
| sprog Posts:1622
| August 31, 2009, 10:18:39 PM Awesomesauce, nice work Tom  Q, that is actually vaguely where CALF cuffs are supposed to be (maybe an inch or so too low, but not much). Most of us actually have them higher than normal. |
| Nurrish Posts:26 | August 31, 2009, 09:42:53 PM narr i like them were they are good for backflip and fronts lol |
| Bbmthbloke Posts:2363 | August 31, 2009, 09:41:50 PM nice, but have u thought of raising ya cuffs? |
Powered by: SMF Gallery