well dk nothing is impossible, as it is possible to time travel in todays world and tecnology, and it has been provenSorry I missed that copy of THE SPORT
well i could go into it but i cant be ased to on here will tell u how at cbYour talking to someone who's worked out that theoretically a "Quantum singularity" has THREE pionts of singularity and the inside is smaller than the outside. But in working out what it would like worked out that you could never reach the center and there for nothing ever could so there could never be one in the frist place.
you think thats mad DK, wait till i dig up the scientific theory for warp engines and faster than light speed travel.11 some think it's only 10 but others think it's 26.
they crazy mofo's talking about manipulating the 11th dimension, that was some mad isht
July 28, 2008 -- It is possible to travel faster than light. You just wouldn't travel faster than light.
Seems strange, but by manipulating extra dimensions with astronomical amounts of energy, two Baylor University physicists have outlined how a faster-than-light engine, or warp drive, could be created that would bend but not break the laws of physics.
"We think we can create an effective warp drive, based on general relatively and string theory," said Gerald Cleaver, coauthor of the paper that recently appeared on the preprint server ArXiv.org
The warp engine is based on a design first proposed in1994 by Michael Alcubierre. The Alcubierre drive, as it's known, involves expanding the fabric of space behind a ship into a bubble and shrinking space-time in front of the ship. The ship would rest in between the expanding and shrinking space-time, essentially surfing down the side of the bubble.
(http://dsc.discovery.com/news/2008/07/28/gallery/warp-drive-540x540.jpg)
The tricky part is that the ship wouldn't actually move; space itself would move underneath the stationary spacecraft. A beam of light next to the ship would still zoom away, same as it always does, but a beam of light far from the ship would be left behind.
That means that the ship would arrive at its destination faster than a beam of light traveling the same distance, but without violating Einstein's relativity, which says that it would take an infinite amount of energy to accelerate an object with mass to the speed of light, since the ship itself isn't actually moving.
The fabric of space has moved faster than light before, says Cleaver, right after the Big Bang, when the universe expanded faster than the speed of light.
"We're recreating the inflationary period of the universe behind the ship," said Cleaver.
While the theory rests on relatively firm ground, the next question is how do you expand space behind the ship and contract it in front of the ship?
Cleaver and Richard Obousy, the other coauthor, propose manipulating the 11th dimension, a special theoretical construct of m-theory (the offspring of string theory), to create the bubble the ship would surf.
If the 11th dimension could be shrunk behind the ship it would create a bubble of dark energy, the same dark energy that is causing the universe to speed up as time goes on. Expanding the 11th dimension in front of the ship would eventually cause it to decrease, although two separate steps are required.
Exactly how the 11th dimension would be expanded and shrunk is still unknown.
"These calculations are based on some arbitrary advance in technology or some alien technology that would let us manipulate the extra dimension," said Cleaver.
What the scientists were able to estimate was the amount of energy necessary, if the technology was available, to change these dimensions: about 10^45 joules.
"That's about the amount of energy you'd get if you converted the entire mass of Jupiter into pure energy via E = mc^2," said Cleaver, an energy far beyond anything humanity can currently envision creating.
While the challenges to creating a warp drive are quite formidable, the concept is intriguing, says Tufts University theoretical physicist Lawrence Ford.
"If there are extra dimensions and we could manipulate them, that would open up all sorts of exciting possibilities," said Ford.
"I don't see this leading immediately to a warp drive, but I could see it leading to other interesting possibilities in basic scientific research," said Ford.
Cleaver agrees that the creation of a real warp drive is still far away.
"Warp drive isn't doable now, and probably won't be for the next several millenia," said Cleaver.
(http://dsc.discovery.com/news/2008/07/28/gallery/warp-540x380.jpg)
i get that bit, its where they start talking about the craft not actually moving at all that starts to lose me, are they talking about the same folding space that event horizon done?No ?
but dk u have to watch the film, as it does have a relivence to all of thisI fell asleep when I went to see it, rather silly film
now i hope there is a geaks parts ot cb for us all to have a good chat
Adding to that the universe is only just over 13 billion years old at most so how can the earth (Which is 4billion btw) be nearly 80 billion4.5 Billion but who counting.
Red :scool:
Adding to that the universe is only just over 13 billion years old at most so how can the earth (Which is 4billion btw) be nearly 80 billion4.5 Billion but who counting.
Red :scool:
The Universe is anywhere between 12 and 20 billion years old !?
well only one thing in this relaity is fact, that i excest, everything else is only a theorySo if I'm only a theory and I'm now reading this arn't you just a theory too ???
to you yes, but to me nowell only one thing in this relaity is fact, that i excest, everything else is only a theorySo if I'm only a theory and I'm now reading this arn't you just a theory too ???
Adding to that the universe is only just over 13 billion years old at most so how can the earth (Which is 4billion btw) be nearly 80 billion4.5 Billion but who counting.
Red :scool:
The Universe is anywhere between 12 and 20 billion years old !?
Fact or Theory!?
Id say Theory.
Then again we both could be someone theory :oto you yes, but to me nowell only one thing in this relaity is fact, that i excest, everything else is only a theorySo if I'm only a theory and I'm now reading this arn't you just a theory too ???
as you would be a theory to me and i am one to you
hope that cleared it up